Carbon Design Engine 3D printing software available for non-carbon customers – 3DPrint.com


Carbon Design Engine is lattice design software that Carbon has designed for its customers. The company has now announced that in 2022, you will be able to license the software and use the output on any printer. The main feature of Design Engine is a near-automated way to create compliant and multizone networks, which speeds up the production of efficient networks in products.

“Creators face fragmented solutions and organizational silos that have caused friction, limitations on innovation and time-to-market. To successfully bring better products to market in less time, organizations need a platform that unifies product design, development, and manufacture. Carbon’s software suite, starting with Design Engine, aims to cover all the steps businesses need to create superior performing products while accelerating time to market, ”said Phil DeSimone, Director of Product and Business Development by Carbon.

Carbon praised the virtues of trellises, recalling that they reduce the material necessary for the realization of an object, while allowing to modify the mechanical properties of a part. In turn, it is possible to create parts that are lighter, but can be designed to provide performance characteristics such as flexibility, improved damping and damping, and heat dissipation. The software is also cloud-based, putting the computational load on Carbon’s servers, rather than engineers’ computers, so network designs can be created quickly and, as Carbon says, “helps creators. to go from the idea to the functional part of the network in a few hours. , rather than days.

One of our customers is bicycle maker Specialized, who worked with Carbon to design 3D printed bicycle saddles. Emma Boutcher, Saddles, Grips and Ribbons Product Manager to specialized states,

” We have invested heavily in research and innovation, with the aim of improving the experience of cyclists on the bike. Our collaboration with Carbon’s Design Engine software and the 3D printing process allowed us to develop a saddle with different damping hp.characteristics, something impossible with traditional foam, leato superior comfort. We wanted to push the boundaries and our partnership with Carbon allowed us to do just that ”,

This is a good idea for anyone who wants to explore the creation of trellises. I am a skeptic in fatigues. Personally, I don’t like them because we can’t predict the long term fatigue properties of networks and really see how those would fail. Over time, how will truss structures behave, how will they age, and how will mechanical properties change? Lasagna you can build stuff with. Spaghetti is unpredictable. I also don’t like the open structure of the trellises and think they attract debris. I much prefer the fill patterns we have in material extrusion and FDM’s ability to encapsulate air in a chamber or produce gradient parts with infill. But trellises are definitely hot and people want to play with them. And if you think of this as a lightweight type of game and a way to use a lot less building materials and time in prints, it’s very exciting indeed.

What does this move mean for Carbon himself? The company will not sell you a machine, it wants to lease it to you. He wants to trim files remotely, doesn’t allow you to do that. All of a sudden, a full command and control company that wants to be in control of its entire offering is playing well with others? What happened? Did the Carbon business development team get lost at the MRRF and come back in kumbaya mood?

Considering the very interesting material properties of Carbon and the huge launch of the company, we can carefully conclude that the adoption of Carbon as a manufacturing technology has been a bit slower than expected. While the Adidas project was spectacular and resulted in the team producing numerous shoes, as they had promised, it is unclear where the company is heading now. It appears to have focused its efforts on partnering with sporting goods companies to manufacture mesh products for this market. I believe sporting goods are a huge opportunity and ancillary opportunities like grips and headrests represent billion dollar applications. But, the company raised over $ 600 million and came out in 2015 with a video.

Commenting on its process, Carbon founder Joseph DeSimone said, “Current 3D printing technology has failed to deliver on its promise to revolutionize manufacturing. Our CLIP technology offers revolutionary speed, consistent mechanical properties and a choice of materials required for complex commercial grade parts.

I have been a notable and publicly lonely carbon skeptic for years. I indicated that I was skeptical about the size of the parts Carbon could manufacture and that I thought the geometries would be limited. And, I admit, they did the shoe thing (although, again, I’m worried about the long-term performance of these parts, but they did). And now I’m skeptical of where the business is going. Is there growth? Presumably they are working on fundamental improvements in technology? I do not know. For me, carbon is a mystery. And don’t get me wrong, I hope they get there, I hope we all get there. Everyone’s success in this market is a catalyst for our collective success. We are not in competition with each other, we are in competition with a wasting mass manufacturing world.


Source link

Previous Textile Printing Machinery Market Size, Growth (2021-2028)
Next Network Printing Software Market 2021: Global Industry Size and Growth Opportunities Till 2027